In: Proceedings of the 4th Meeting of the
ICAZ Bird Working Group, Krakow, Poland, 11-15 September, 2001. Acta zoologica
cracoviensia, 45 (special issue), pp. 109-116.
Zhilin Mikhail
Gennadievich, Karhu Alexander
Alfredovich
Exploitation
of birds in the early Mesolithic of Central Russia.
Abstract
About 20
Mesolithic peat-bog sites were discovered during last ten years by the Upper
Volga expedition in Central Russia, 14 of them were excavated, in which a lot of
bird bones were found. The present paper deals with avian remains from early
Mesolithic layers. The most ancient one is the lower layer of Stanovoye 4 site,
referred to the Younger Dryas by pollen and about 10300-10000 BP uncalibrated by
C-14. The lower layer of Ivanovskoye 7 site is dated to the second quarter of
the Preboreal by pollen and about 9650 BP by C14. The layer III of Stanovoye 4
is referred to the late Preboreal by pollen and about 9200 BP by C14. Thirty
four bird species were identified from these layers. Remains of waterfowl are
most abundant in all layers. Capercaillie also
played an important role. Other avian species are represented in a small number
or by single bones. The palaeoecological data and the role of birds in economy of the early
Mesolithic population is discussed.
Key
words: birds,
early Mesolithic, peat bog sites
Zhilin Mikhail
Gennadievich
Institute of
Archaeology RAS
Planernaya
street, 3-2-235
Moscow 123480
Russia
E-mail: mizhilin@yandex.ru
Karhu Alexander
Albertovich
Palaeontological
Institute RAS
Profsoyuznaya
street, 123
Moscow 117997
Russia
E-mail:
akarhu@paleo.ru
I.
Introduction
Dozens of
Mesolithic sites were excavated and hundreds were discovered during last decades
in Central Russia. Most of these sites are situated on mineral soils where
organic materials are not preserved. About 20 Mesolithic peat bog sites with
good preservation of various organic remains were discovered during last ten
years by the Upper Volga expedition in Central Russia, 14 of them were excavated.
Numerous mammalian, fish and avian bones side by side with artefacts made from
stone, bone, antler, wood and other plant materials were found in reliable
stratigraphic context. Wide use of C14 and pollen analyses made possible
accurate dating and reconstruction of vegetation and climate during the
habitation of these sites. Most part of Mesolithic peat bog sites with good
preservation of organic remains in
the East European forest zone belong to the middle and late Mesolithic and are
dated to the Boreal and Atlantic periods. Early Mesolithic peat bog sites dated
to the Preboreal period are still very scarce. Two of them – Pulli and
Zveinieki 2 (lower layer) are in Estonia and Latvia, three others –
Ivanovskoye 7 (lower layer), Stanovoye 4 (cut 3, layers IV, IIIa and III) and Sahtysh 14 (lower layer) are situated in the
Volga-Oka interflew (Fig. 1).
Ivanovskoye peat
bog (Fig. 1, 1) is situated about
150 km to the north-east from
Moscow, between Moscow and
Yaroslavl in the middle flow of river Nerl, which ran through a large lake
during the Stone Age, connecting it with the
Klyazma river, the tributary of
the left bank of the Oka. Ten sites were discovered there. Ivanovskoye 7 is the most interesting. 106
square meters were excavated
there by D.A. Krainov in
1974-1975, and 332 square meters by M.G. Zhilin in 1992-1997. The site
has three Mesolithic and two Neolithic layers. Mesolithic settlements occupied
low promontory during lake regressions, which was submerged during
transgressions. The lower, early Mesolithic (IV) layer belongs to early Butovo
culture and is dated by C14 (all dates in the present paper are uncalibrated
before 1950) to 9650+-110 BP
(GIN-9520)
and 9640+-60 BP
(GIN-9516).
It is dated by pollen to the first half of the Preboreal period before its
optimum. During middle Preboreal transgression it was submerged; the bottom of
gyttja layer, overlapping the lower cultural layer is dated by C14 to
9690+-120BP (GIN-9367), 9500+-110 BP (GIN-9517)
and 9500+-100 BP (GIN-9385).
Podozerskoye
peat bog (Fig. 1, 2) is situated between Ivanovo and Yaroslavl,
in 50 km to the south-east from the
latter. The river Lahost,
the tributary of the right bank of the river Kotorosl which is the tributary of
the right bank of the Upper Volga, starts
from this bog. Five sites were discovered there. Stanovoye 4 site is the most
interesting. It is situated at a
promontory between a shallow gulf of a large ancient lake and a small pond from
which the Lahost river started. 427
square meters were excavated there in 1992-2001. The site has 4 Mesolithic
layers. The lower (IV) earliest Mesolithic layer is the earliest site of
Butovo culture. Pollen data indicate that formation of gyttja with finds of the
IV cultural layer took place during the terminal part of the Younger Dryas. C14
dates of the bottom of gyttja layer, incorporating cultural remains in the
central part of cut 3 - 10060+-120 BP (GIN-10127 I), 10040+-90 BP (GIN-10027 II),
9970+-50 BP (GIN-10026 I), 9940+-50 BP (GIN-10026 II) estimate the dating of a
transgression which flooded the site. The same layer in cut 2 is also referred
to terminal Younger Dryas by pollen evidence and received a C-14 date 10300±70
(GIN- -10112 – II). The next occupation of the site by the population of
Ienevo culture took place during during a very short period in the first half of
the Preboreal period, just before its optimum (about 9600 BP). A
wooden stake, sharpened with a stone axe or adze from this layer in the cut 3 is
C14 dated to 9620+-60 BP (GIN-8377). A sample of peat with gyttja, overlaying
this layer in the central part of cut 3 is C14 dated to 9560+-40 BP (GIN-10125
II) and 9480+-120 BP (GIN-10125 I), marking
the submergence of the site during middle Preboreal transgression.
Cultural layer III, belonging to middle stage of Butovo culture, is referred in
cut 3 to the second half of the
Preboreal period by pollen (about 9300-9000 BP). C14 dates of peat
samples from it are 9280+-240 BP (GIN-10122 I) and 9090+-400 BP (GIN-10124). A
wooden stake, sharpened with a stone adze dated to 9220+-60 BP (GIN-8375),
determines the habitation period of the site more accurately.
The
Sakhtysh peat
bog (Fig. 3, 3) is situated in 40 km to the south-west from Ivanovo,
connected by a small river Koika through Nerl to Klyazma, the tributary of the left bank of the Oka. The
site occupies a place in a peat bog at the foot of a very gentle promontory of a
terrace of the late glacial lake. During the Mesolithic it occupied a low lake
shore near the river outlet. The site was discovered in 1999, 108 square meters
were excavated in 1999-2001. Five Mesolithic layers belonging to Butovo culture
were investigated at the site. The lower (IV) layer is dated to Preboreal by
pollen, C14 dates are in process.
II.
Avian remains
The most
representative collection of bird remains comes from the lower layer of
Ivanovskoye 7 site (Karhu, 2002), it includes 921 defined bone remains, 788 of
which belong to 34 bird species (table 1).
Good preservation of separate samples goes with rather high general
fragmentation of bones. Thus besides identified bones 940 undeterminable
fragments, mainly shafts diatheses
were found. 270 (28,7%) of the latter belong to young individuals, while
among 788 identified bones there are only
46 such finds (5,8%). Nine species (26%) are represented only by 1-2 bones.
Condition of bone surfaces indicates their mechanical fragmentation took place
before burial. Table 2 gives
anatomic composition of identified samples.
Table 1. Avian
species from Ivanovskoje 7, layer IV. NISP - number of identified
specimens; MNI - minimum number of individuals
Species |
NISP |
NISP% |
|
MNI% |
Gavia arctica (Loon ) Чернозобая
гагара |
38 |
4,8 |
7 |
4,6 |
Gavia sp. |
2 |
|
|
|
Podiceps auritus (Red-neck grebe )
Красношейная поганка |
139 |
17,6 |
13 |
8,6 |
Podiceps cristatus (Grebe )
Чомга |
14 |
1,8 |
3 |
2 |
Podiceps griseigena (Grey-cheek grebe )
Серощекая поганка |
2 |
0,3 |
1 |
0,7 |
Ardea cinerea (Heron ) Серая
цапля |
34 |
4,3 |
9 |
5,9 |
Botaurus stellaris
(Bittern ) Выпь |
4 |
0,5 |
2 |
1,3 |
Pandion haliaetus
(Osprey ) Скопа |
3 |
0,4 |
1 |
0,7 |
Haliaeetus albicilla
(White-tailed eagle ) Белохвостый
орлан |
2 |
0,3 |
1 |
0,7 |
Anser fabalis ( )Гусь гуменник |
16 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
Anser albifrons (White-frontlet goose ) Белолобый гусь |
3 |
0,4 |
1 |
0,7 |
Anser anser (Grey goose )
Серый гусь |
23 |
2,9 |
2 |
1,3 |
Anser sp. |
1 |
|
|
|
Anas penelope ( ) Свиязь |
31 |
3,9 |
7 |
4,6 |
Anas strepera (Grey duck ) Серая
утка |
45 |
5,7 |
8 |
5,3 |
Anas crecca (Teal ) Чирок-свистунок |
20 |
2,5 |
6 |
3,9 |
Anas plathyrhynchos
(Mallard)
Кряква |
93 |
11,8 |
15 |
11,2 |
Anas acuta (Pintail)
Шилохвость |
36 |
4,6 |
7 |
4,6 |
Anas querquedula (Teal ) Чирок-трескунок |
31 |
3,9 |
6 |
3,9 |
Anas clypeata (Shoveller )
Широконоска |
32 |
4 |
10 |
6,6 |
Aythya ferina (Red-headed pochard )
Красноголовая чернеть |
53 |
6,7 |
8 |
5,3 |
Aythya fuligula (Crested pochard)
Хохлатая чернеть |
63 |
8 |
13 |
8,6 |
Aythya marila (Sea pochard ) Морская
чернеть |
24 |
3 |
4 |
2,6 |
Clangula hyemalis
( ) Морянка |
1 |
0,1 |
1 |
0,7 |
Bucephala clangula (Golden eye )
Гоголь обыкновенный |
9 |
1,1 |
3 |
2 |
Mergus serrator (Long-beaked merganser )
Длинноклювый крохаль |
1 |
0,1 |
1 |
0,7 |
Mergellus albellus
(Merganser ) Крохаль-луток |
8 |
1 |
2 |
1,3 |
Anatinae |
130 |
|
|
|
Lyrurus tetrix (black-grouse ) Тетерев |
6 |
0,8 |
2 |
1,3 |
Tetrao urogallus (wood-grouse ) Глухарь |
31 |
3,9 |
6 |
3,9 |
Grus grus (Crane )
Серый журавль |
3 |
0,4 |
1 |
0,7 |
Porzana porzana (
) Погоныш обыкновенный |
1 |
0,1 |
1 |
0,7 |
Fulica atra (Coot ) Лысуха |
16 |
2 |
4 |
2,6 |
Limosa limosa ( ) Большой веретенник |
2 |
0,3 |
1 |
0,7 |
Larus ridibundus (Lake gull )
Озерная чайка |
2 |
0,3 |
1 |
0,7 |
Corvus cornix (Grey crow )
Серая ворона |
1 |
0,3 |
1 |
0,7 |
Corvus frugilegus (Rook )
Грач |
1 |
0,3 |
1 |
0,7 |
Defined to species |
788 |
100,1 |
152 |
101,8 |
Total defined |
921 |
|
|
|
Nunmber of species |
34 |
|
|
|
Table II.
Anatomical composition of the identified bone
remains of birds from Ivanovskoje 7, layer IV. NISP – number of identified
specimens; number of specimens identified only to generic or subfamily levels
are shown in brackets
Coracoideum
189 (15) |
|
||
Humerus |
156 (14) |
||
Tibiotarsus |
107 (16) |
||
Scapula |
103 (8) |
||
Ulna |
57 (10) |
||
Carpometacarpus |
56 (5) |
||
Radius |
40 |
||
Tarsometatarsus |
41 (7) |
||
Femur |
17 (1) |
||
Sternum |
6 (27) |
||
Clavicula |
4 (30) |
||
Mandibula |
5 |
||
Vertebrae |
- |
||
Phalanga proximalis digiti majoris |
3 |
||
Quadratum |
2 |
||
Phalanges pedis |
2 |
||
Frontale |
- |
||
Total |
788 (133) |
Various ducks
and other waterfowl are most abundant and include 20 species. Their remains make
67,3% of total identified samples. Ducks of the genus Anas
are most numerous – 36,5% of identified bones. Mallard (Anas
platyrhynchos) prevails, while gadwall (Anas strepera), teal (Anas crecca) and
garganey (Anas querquedula), pintail (Anas acuta), pochard (Aythya ferina),
tufted duck (Aythya fuligula), smew (Mergellus albellus) are represented in an
ordinary way. Among geese are gray lap (Anser anser),
bean (Anser fabalis) and white-fronted (Anser albifrons). Scaup (Aythya
marila) and goldeneye (Bucephala clangula)
are also present, while red-breasted merganser (Mergus serrator) was
identified from a single bone.
Black throated
diver (Gavia arctica) is quite common. Remains of a slavonian grebe (Podiceps
auritus) are most numerous, even 1,5 times more abundant than remains of a
mallard. Great crested grebe (Podiceps cristaus) and red-necked grebe (Podiceps
grisegena) are much more scarce. 91% of gray heron (Ardea cinerea) bones came
from young birds. Several bones of bittern were also found.
Birds of prey
are represented by white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) and osprey (Pandion
haliaetus). Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) is represented mainly by bones of
adult male birds – 24 of 31 (77,4%). The number of blackgrouse (Tetrao tetrix)
bones is substantially less. Three bones of crane (Grus grus) were identified.
Coot (Fulica atra) composes a small series of bones, while black-headed gull (Larus
ridibundus), hooded crow (Corvus lorone cornix) and rook (Corvus frugilegus) are
represented by 1-2 bones each.
In general avian
assemblage of the lower layer of Ivanovskoje 7 shows a dominance of hydrophilic
species – ducks, geese, divers, grebes, heron, gull, bittern, crane, coot,
white-tailed eagle, osprey – 30 from 34 identified species. Among others
hooded crow and rook prefer meadow and bushy meadow areas, while capercaillie
lives in the forest. Black-grouse inhabits both
bushy water-meadows and sparse forests with water-meadows or raised bogs.
Only capercaillie and black-grouse are settled species, hooded crow – settled
or limited nomadic, while all other identified species are migrants.
Excavations of
Stanovoye 4 site are not finished yet, and studies of bird remains are still in
process. About 500 identifiable bones come mainly from layer III. Preliminary 24
species were identified. As in Ivanovskoye 7, the main part of the avian
assemblage of the Mesolithic layers
of Stanovoye 4 is composed of hydrophilic species – ducks, geese, divers,
grebes. Remains of birds of prey first of all white-tailed eagle are more
numerous here. On the other side, remains of such important forest bird as
capercaillie are very scarce. In general, systematic composition of avian
assemblages of Mesolithic layers of Ivanovskoye 7 and Stanovoye 4 correspond to
modern avifauna of Central Russia. Excavations of Sahtysh 14 site are in its
initial phase, faunal remains were not studied yet. We can only say, that bird
remains are abundant in the lower layer and bones of waterfowl are obviously
rather numerous.
III.
Bird hunting
All identified
samples belong to medium and large species, what is typical for collections
coming from hunting activities. Correlation of finds of representatives of
different ecological groups characterize mostly selective character of the hunt
than development of corresponding biotopes and the structure of bird
population in the area around the site. Mesolithic populations of both
Ivanovskoye 7 and Stanovoye 4 sites preferred to hunt birds in
surroundings of their habitation sites including
the water and areas near the water. These localities attracted prehistoric
hunters by abundance of many bird species valuable for hunting.
Good
preservation of bone does not let
to suppose that scarcity of remains of young birds can be explained by
taphonomic conditions. Dominance of bones of adult birds indicates seasonal mass
bird hunting before beginning of autumn migrations, i.e. before the moment when
young individuals prevail over adult ones and should compose the main part of
taken birds. Late spring (after the end of the spring flood) and summer hunting
of waterfowl seems most probable.
The only clearly observed exclusion is heron, represented at Ivanovskoye 7
mainly by bones of juveniles (91%).
It supposes that grown up nestlings and young poorly flying herons could be a
special hunting object. Forest hunting
after capercaillie was ordinary practiced but its role was much less than that
of waterfowl.
Hunting weapons
are well represented among finds from early Mesolithic layers of Ivanovskoye 7,
Stanovoye 4 and Sakhtysh 14. Bow and arrows were the main weapon used primarily
for hunting mammals and also waterfowl and large fish, as indicated by numerous
stray finds of bone arrowheads in ancient lake deposits at considerable distance
from habitation sites. Arrowheads from sites mentioned above include various
types, made from mammalian bones (Zhilin, 1998, 2001).
Some of them, especially slotted ones with one or two rows of flint
microblades along sides, fixed in slots with a special pitch were used
for hunting large mammals. Small finely barbed points
were used for shooting pikes in shallow water. The specimen from
Ivanovskoye 7 was found stuck deeply in the lake bottom at an angle about 70% to
it. Arrowheads of this and some other types (fig. 2) could be used for shooting
big birds as well.
But the majority
of waterfowl, especially ducks and grebes were caught with the help of
loops and nets. Loops installed above the water usually catch ducks, and
dominance of the latter in bird remains from studied sites confirms this. Grebes,
divers and saw-bills get into loops rather rarely. They were caught by
stationary nets – either as by product of fishing,
or by nets installed specially for this purpose. Only catching by nets
can explain that remains of a slavonian grebe are 1,5 times more numerous than
remains of mallard in the lower layer of Ivanovskoye 7. Net catching of the
former is most probable because this species usually feeds at shallow water,
overgrown by water plants – areas also preferred by so called “grass” pike.
The latter composes most part of fish, caught by early Mesolithic inhabitants of
the mentioned sites. The use of nets for fishing is documented by a series of
net sinkers from early Mesolithic layers of Ivanovskoye 3 and Stanovoye 4.
Flocks of moulting drakes could be driven into nets installed above the water,
probably supplemented by a fence like a fish trap. Remains of such fences were
excavated at Stanovoye 4, and a fish trap, made from split willow branches was
found in the IIIa layer of Stanovoye 4, accompanied by a large sinker.
Capercaillie were probably taken with bow or cough by loops and other traps.
IV.
Conclusions
Pollen data (Spiridonova,
Aleshinskaya, 1999) indicate that since the transition from the Pleistocene to
the Holocene early Mesolithic populations in Central Russia preferred large lake
depressions and river valleys, occupied by forests of the taiga type.
Surrounding landscapes were rather mosaic in the first half of the Preboreal
with some areas at watersheds still covered by tundra and steppe elements. Dry
meadows were also widespread, bogs occupied depressions. Hunting of large
mammals was the basis of the early Mesolithic economy, elk and beaver being most
important hunted animals (Kirillova, 2002). Fishing was the second important
branch of economy. Pike dominates among fish bones from early Mesolithic sites
in Central Russia with good bone preservation (Sychevskaya, 2002).
Hunting of mammals and fishing were supplemented by gathering of edible
forest and water plants, as indicated by hazel nut shells, some with imprints of
human teeth, and water lilies seeds,
also met in coprolites, from the
lower cultural layer of Ivanovskoye 7.
Studies of bird
exploitation in Central Russia during early Mesolithic showed that this branch
of hunting played important role in food supply and was
well developed, supplementing hunting of mammals and fishing. Waterfowl
was most important. Methods and hunting gear were various and rather
sophisticated, bringing considerable amount of spoil. Analyses of settlement
patterns indicate that summer camps were founded in localities, suitable for
forest hunting, fishing and fowling at the same time. Since the very beginning
of the Mesolithic the population of Central Russia was practicing complex
economy of forest hunters, fishers and gatherers in which bird hunting played
rather important role.
References
Karhu A.A. 2002.
Ornitocomplex of the site Ivanovskoye 7. In: M.G Zhilin et al. Mesolithic and
Neolithic cultures on Upper Volga (after materials of Ivanovskoye 7). Nauka.
Moscow. (In Russian).
Kirillova I.V.
2002. Mammalian fauna fromthe site Ivanovskoye 7. In: M.G Zhilin. et al.
Mesolithic and Neolithic cultures on Upper Volga (after materials of Ivanovskoye
7). Nauka. Moscow. (In Russian).
Spiridonova E.A.,
Aleshinskaya A.S. 1999. An attenpt of application of pollen analysis to the
Mesolithic sites of the Volga-Oka interflew.
In: V.L. Egorov
(ed.) The State History Museum – an encyclopedia of Fatherland history and
culture. GIM publishing department. Moscow,
127-141.
Sychevskaya E.K.
2002. The composition of catches and character of fishing of the inhabitants of
the site Ivanovskoye 7. In:
M.G Zhilin et al. Mesolithic and Neolithic cultures on Upper Volga (after
materials of Ivanovskoye 7). Nauka. Moscow. (In Russian).
Zhilin M. 1998.
Technology of the Manufacture of Mesolithic
Bone Arrowheads on the Upper Volga. European Journal of Archaeology: 1998:1:2: 149-175.
Zhilin, M.G.
2001. Mesolithic bone industry of the East European forest zone. URSS publishing
house. Moscow. (in Russian).
Illustrations
Fig. 1. Early
Mesolithic sites with good preservation of organic remains in Eastern Europe. 1
– Ivanovskoye 7; 2 – Stanovoye 4; 3 – Sakhtysh 14; 4 – Pulli; 5 –
Zveiniyeki 2.
Fig. 2. Bone
arrowheads which were probably used for hunting birds: 1-4 – Ivanovskoye 7,
layer IV; 5-6 – Stanovoye 4, cut 3, layer III.